<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Edmund in Tokyo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edmundintokyo.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edmundintokyo.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to vote securely over the internet by Constitutional QWERTY: Democracy without the stuck keys &#171; Edmund in Tokyo</title>
		<link>http://edmundintokyo.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/how-to-vote-securely-over-the-internet/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Constitutional QWERTY: Democracy without the stuck keys &#171; Edmund in Tokyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edmundintokyo.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/how-to-vote-securely-over-the-internet/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] should be able to exercise it. That didn&#8217;t used to be practical; now we have the internet. Vote on everything that way. Problem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should be able to exercise it. That didn&#8217;t used to be practical; now we have the internet. Vote on everything that way. Problem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Google changing voters&#8217; brains? by Joe Otten</title>
		<link>http://edmundintokyo.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/is-google-changing-voters-brains/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Otten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edmundintokyo.wordpress.com/?p=5#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Nah this is scraping the barrel for social trends to explain bad polling.

The explanation for bad polling is simple. It is good polling. The actual results are bad, thanks to Diebold et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah this is scraping the barrel for social trends to explain bad polling.</p>
<p>The explanation for bad polling is simple. It is good polling. The actual results are bad, thanks to Diebold et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
